Pierre Villepreux returns to the playing style that has always defended, for the simple and good reason that this style has not aged.
In this chronicle, it is not only to proclaim the best playing the beautiful game should be what we always choose to play as a priority. If pulses
express different than other styles of play, not to infiltrate the brain and impose a single conception of the game and training that should logically result.
would be locked in a bubble that will preclude any other way of thinking.
therefore do not wish to be placed in a category of theorists who would not be open to other styles and ideas.
But if you want to continue enhancing the choice of style is also why the current teaching in which I enrolled, despite the weather, not aged.
I think even more topical than ever, if one accepts that rugby now has some limitations that must be overcome to give it more visibility, more audience with all the consequences that entails.
order for this development is realized in the best condition and runs around a style and a choice of training of technicians and players must be that rugby is produced by teams that actually play in motion.
In this sense, the football world has brought little.
He especially showed the reverse even if we can sustain the game for some teams, particularly Fiji.
The challenge of the game that launched the Fijian teams and especially to the eventual champions, even though he brought the sympathy will be quickly forgotten because it did not lead the team to gain the island.
in our society is the result that counts, not enough to lose with honor to be recognized and to influence the technical challenge and a bearer of the most successful production threats that hope.
'm not sure the rest of the arrival of new rules - even if they are needed - to create a dynamic that transforms the game unless there is a willingness on the part of engineers to use them in a positive way. Play
movement implies a clear definition of this option and not a less clear understanding of the formation of players to enter the "know how to play on the move.
It already is evidence, put them in full swing.
This means that the emphasis should be raised in time to an ever finer and judicious development of the principles of momentary tactical action game and its evolution, both offensively and defense.
This knowledge determines the level of tactical skills useful gesture, that is the technique.
Now, you will need to give birth to the technique because of the tactical training is the result of good decision making, a good choice, just play and not as is too often perceived as the reason for the gaps proved.
Consequently, form players eligible to become versatile players, able at the time of the game, to take the initiative which is applicable regardless of the number that goes and regardless of whether he or the sequence of play, but also the form of game in which he is temporarily involved (context, "situational substitution) that allows to exploit his versatility.
This is seen in the "full game" by creating the first projection conditions sufficient, prerequisites to become aware of behaviors that will be useful to have in all phases of suspension of movement of the ball (ruck and maul) but also from among the static phases .
This long journey of education, that accepts the motion as the first, giving players on offense:
- The ability to produce complex and effective movement of the game initially through awareness of the effects on the defense.
- The ability to exploit the same time justify the recovery of the ball (when playing a fast turn-on over ", when counter- unfavorable for football)
Indeed it is, for one day this type of players, not to mislead the training, especially in what qualifies "as the original."
The latter is crucial for the future of those who practice rugby.
Nothing is possible if we return to a restrictive game, a tactical plan with the same exact chain of repeated actions so unchanging.
If this game is charged, does not bring more players capable of evolving.
Once you exit the "closed system", their ability to change the game become void if not at least getting weaker. The meeting
Toulouse-Leinster is in this sense, reassuring.
Hopefully this game will inspire vocations in the production of coaches and players.
This is a step in training for the coach to whom players must adhere to practicing a formation movement.
is claimed on a particular job to give them fixed bases, reliable and steady, references that do not dictate the way forward, but many signs that allow to remain on the road, which is not to prevent the renewal of other tactics.
Rugbyrama - Pierre Villepreux - 20 / 1
0 comments:
Post a Comment